That was neat. The 13 × 12 × ... etc gets "cancelled out", leaving only 16 × 15 × 14.
The formula is written:
n!(n − r)!
where n is the number of things to choose from,
and we choose r of them,
no repetitions,
order matters.
Combinations without Repetition
The easiest way to explain it is to:
assume that the order does matter (ie permutations),
then alter it so the order does not matter.
We already know that 3 out of 16 gave us 3,360 permutations.
But many of those are the same to us now, because we don't care what order!
For example, let us say balls 1, 2 and 3 are chosen. These are the possibilites:
Order does matter
Order doesn't matter
1 2 3
1 3 2
2 1 3
2 3 1
3 1 2
3 2 1
1 2 3
So, the permutations have 6 times as many possibilites.
In fact there is an easy way to work out how many ways "1 2 3" could be placed in order, and we have already talked about it. The answer is:
3!= 3 × 2 × 1 = 6
(Another example: 4 things can be placed in 4!= 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 24 different ways, try it for yourself!)
So we adjust our permutations formula to reduce it by how many ways the objects could be in order (because we aren't interested in their order any more):
Combinations with Repetition
Let us say there are five flavors of icecream: banana, chocolate, lemon, strawberry and vanilla.
We can have three scoops. How many variations will there be?
Let's use letters for the flavors: {b, c, l, s, v}. Example selections include
{c, c, c} (3 scoops of chocolate)
{b, l, v} (one each of banana, lemon and vanilla)
{b, v, v} (one of banana, two of vanilla)
(And just to be clear: There are n=5 things to choose from, and we choose r=3 of them.
Order does not matter, and we can repeat!)
Now, I can't describe directly to you how to calculate this, but I can show you a special techniquethat lets you work it out.
Think about the ice cream being in boxes, we could say "move past the first box, then take 3 scoops, then move along 3 more boxes to the end" and we will have 3 scoops of chocolate!
So it is like we are ordering a robot to get our ice cream, but it doesn't change anything, we still get what we want.
We can write this down as (arrow means move, circle means scoop).
In fact the three examples above can be written like this:
{c, c, c} (3 scoops of chocolate):
{b, l, v} (one each of banana, lemon and vanilla):
{b, v, v} (one of banana, two of vanilla):
OK, so instead of worrying about different flavors, we have a simpler question: "how many different ways can we arrange arrows and circles?"
Notice that there are always 3 circles (3 scoops of ice cream) and 4 arrows (we need to move 4 times to go from the 1st to 5th container).
So (being general here) there are r + (n−1) positions, and we want to choose r of them to have circles.
This is like saying "we have r + (n−1) pool balls and want to choose r of them". In other words it is now like the pool balls question, but with slightly changed numbers. And we can write it like this:
where n is the number of things to choose from,
and we choose r of them
repetition allowed,
order doesn't matter.
Interestingly, we can look at the arrows instead of the circles, and say "we have r + (n−1)positions and want to choose (n−1) of them to have arrows", and the answer is the same:
the binomial coefficients are the positive integers that occur as coefficients in the binomial theorem. Commonly, a binomial coefficient is indexed by a pair of integers n ≥ k ≥ 0 and is written It is the coefficient of the xk term in the polynomial expansion of the binomialpower(1 + x)n, and it is given by the formula
For example, the fourth power of 1 + x is
and the binomial coefficient is the coefficient of the x2 term.
A binomial coefficient C(n, k) can be defined as the coefficient of X^k in the expansion of (1 + X)^n.
A binomial coefficient C(n, k) also gives the number of ways, disregarding order, that k objects can be chosen from among n objects; more formally, the number of k-element subsets (or k-combinations) of an n-element set.
The value of C(n, k) can be recursively calculated using following standard formula for Binomial Coefficients.